360˚ Agentic Leadership Feedback
A single number was never enough to describe how a person actually works, and a rating from one supervisor never captured more than a fraction of it. 360˚ Agentic Leadership Feedback gathers judgment from every seat around a person, a manager, a set of peers, direct reports and the person themselves, and measures a set of competencies no widely used instrument yet brings together in one place, judgment over an agent's recommendation, governance literacy, intent specification, risk management and accountability for a decision made in partnership with a system that can act on its own, alongside the competencies that have always mattered, analytical ability, business knowledge, communication, conflict management and change leadership.Two full instruments sit inside one design. A fifteen competency agentic questionnaire serves an organization already sharing decisions with autonomous systems. A twenty competency generic questionnaire, covering vision setting, delegation, coaching and feedback, serves one that has not yet arrived there. Both carry the same scoring method, the same self and others gap analysis, and a sample report that shows exactly how a profile turns into a development plan. A rating drawn from one relationship has always carried the limits of that relationship. Gathering the same judgment from a manager, a set of peers, and where relevant a group of direct reports produces a picture closer to how a person is actually experienced across an organization than any single observer can offer alone. That idea has anchored 360 degree feedback for decades and remains the foundation of the instrument built across these pages. What has moved is the range of behavior a modern workplace now asks a leader to show, and closing that gap is the reason the instrument exists.360˚ Agentic Leadership Feedback Most 360 degree tools still measure communication, delegation, conflict management and the handful of competencies that defined leadership before an autonomous agent ever sat inside a decision. Those behaviors remain necessary and this instrument keeps them. A workplace built only on them no longer accounts for what actually separates a good outcome from a bad one once an agent enters the room. Therefore the AGENTIC COMPETENCIES to make the instrument complete.

